Privacy News Highlights
06–15 September 2008
Contents:
CA – Alberta Commissioner: Thumb Scanners OK
CA – Committee Recommends Amendments to B.C.’s
Private Sector Privacy Legislation
CA – Rosh Hashanah Cards from Prime Minister Elicit
Questions
CA – Nova Scotia Cancels Drivers’ Mental Health
Questions
US – Virginia Supreme Court Says Anti-Spam Law is
Too Broad
US – Group Wants Incentives for EHR Usage
HK – Researchers Develop Heartbeat-Based Encryption
for Implanted Medical Devices
US – New Nevada Law Requires Data Encryption
EU – Germany to Tighten Laws After Data Theft
Scandal
EU – Government Forms Data Privacy Group
EU – Report: ‘Digital Tsunami’ Erodes Privacy
UK – Drivers’ Database Draws Scrutiny
KR – Korea Logs Highest Number of Network Security
Breaches in August
US – Researchers Probe Heists Without Holdups
CA – Right to Know Week Activities Announced
HK – Hong Kong Hospital Authority to Invest Millions
in Privacy
US – Countrywide Notifying Customers of Data Breach
KR – Customer Data Found on Discarded Disks
WW – Pew Reports on Cloud Computing; Privacy Worries
Linger
US – Law Enforcement Needs Warrant to Access Stored
Mobile Phone Company Data
US – Feds Set to Take Over Airline Watch List
Checking, Again
WW – Google Tightens Data Retention Policy — Again
WW – Google Promises Privacy Fixes in Its Chrome
Browser
WW – Mozilla Plans Privacy Mode
WW – Q&A with Commissioner Cavoukian
WW – Facebook to Test Web Safety Icon
VM – Vietnamese Pre-paid Phone Subscribers Must Now
Divulge Personal Information
US – Privacy ‘08 Campaign Launched
US – Iowa County Officials Planned to Sell Data
US – IT Managers Fear Job Loss
EU – French Citizens Oppose Massive Database
UK – Police Quiz British Telecome on Secret Phorm
Trials
US – Surveillance Cameras a Boon to Crime Fighting
in Newark
UK – Tracesmart Granted Access to Death Registration
Information
US – Profiles For Your Eyes Only: Social Networking
for Spies
US – Senators Introduce 2008 Federal Information
Security Management Act
US – Proposed Calif. Law Would Impose Security
Requirements on Retailers
US – No ‘Legitimate’ Privacy Expectation in Data on
Office Computer, Court Says
After
an investigation into complaints filed by employees ordered to use thumb and
hand-scanners on the job, Alberta privacy commissioner Frank Work said
biometric scanning devices do not violate individuals’ privacy, reports Sun
Media. Employers are increasingly turning to such systems to manage employee
attendance in an effort to reduce paperwork and prevent attendance fraud.
Because the systems in question do not retain the thumb or hand prints, Work
deemed they do not violate employees’ privacy. [Source]
[Investigation
Report]
A
Special Committee recently presented to the Legislative Assembly of British
Columbia its report arising from the statutory review of B.C.’s Personal
Information Protection Act (PIPA). Generally speaking, the recommendations in
the committee’s report represent only a minimal tweaking of the existing
legislation and reflect a perception that the legislation is working well for
both individuals and organizations. The recommendations include:
[Source] [Special
Committee to Review the Personal Information Protection Act]
With
three weeks to go until Rosh Hashanah, Jewish Canadians have again begun
receiving greeting cards from the Prime Minister (PM), leaving some questioning
how the PM’s office knows their names and religious affiliations. “I was a
little alarmed at the idea that the government might have some list of Canadian
Jews...” said one public servant who received a card at his home in Ottawa. “It
doesn’t seem my religion should be the business of any federal government,” he
added. The PM sent Rosh Hashanah cards last year, garnering similar reactions.
The Tories said they got the names and addresses from community directories,
the reports states. [Source]
Nova
Scotia has pulled a new application form for getting a driver’s licence because
of concern over questions it asked about applicants’ psychiatric history. Those
who acknowledge they had at some point in their lives -- whether a bout of
depression or ongoing schizophrenia – were supposed to give more specific
details and then have a doctor complete an assessment and provide further
information about their medical history. The old application form, which will
be put back into use, asked if people had full use of eyes, ears, hands and
feet or had lost consciousness in the past 10 years or had any other medical
conditions that could affect driving. [Source]
The
Virginia Supreme Court has overturned a Virginia anti-spam law and a lower
court spam conviction on the grounds that the state’s anti-spam law violates
the defendant’s First Amendment rights to free speech. Jeremy Jaynes was
sentenced to nine years in prison in 2005. He was convicted in 2004 on three
counts for sending unsolicited commercial email to tens of thousands of AOL
customers. He obtained the AOL addresses from a stolen database. The court
ruled that the 2003 Virginia anti-spam law is overly broad because it does not
distinguish between commercial and political messages and under its purview,
the Federalist Papers sent in a similar manner would constitute a violation of
the law. [Source]
[Source]
[Source]
A
group of CEOs representing about 160 U.S. companies is urging Congress to make
the adoption of health IT technologies a priority in the coming legislative
session. At a briefing in Washington, D.C. last week, the Business Roundtable
sought legislative action to provide incentives for healthcare outfits to use
electronic health record systems, the reports states. Currently, privacy
concerns are holding up bipartisan legislation to create interoperable
standards for health IT. [Source]
Researchers
from the Chinese University of Hong Kong have developed a method of encrypting
implanted medical device signals that uses the patient’s own heartbeat pattern
as the encryption key. Because of minor fluctuations in people’s heartbeats, an
attacker could not record a heartbeat and use it at a later date. [Source]
[Source]
Nevada
has passed a new law that, as of October 1, 2008, requires Nevada businesses to
encrypt all electronic transmissions (except facsimiles) of a costumer’s
personal information if the information is sent outside “the secure system of
the business.”Personal information” is a person’s first name or first initial
and last name, combined with either the person’s (1) Social Security number, (2) driver’s license or
identification card number, or (3) account number, credit card number, or debit
card number, combined with any required security code, access code, or password
that would permit access to the person’s financial account. The law applies to
businesses “in this State [Nevada].” [Source]
Germany
is to tighten data protection laws, Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said,
responding to revelations that Germans’ personal data can be bought easily on
the Internet. Mr. Schaeuble said a working group would draw up proposals on
higher fines for data protection violations and tighter rules on the trade with
personal and financial information. Germany’s latest privacy scandal was
triggered by reports that a call centre employee alerted authorities to a
problem with his company’s data collection practices by handing over data on
some 17,000 addresses and bank account details to a privacy protection office.
Privacy officials have also said they had been able to buy millions of items of
personal data, including bank and phone data, undercover on the Internet. Mr.
Schaeuble said in future firms would only be able to hand on personal data if
consumers had specifically agreed. Existing rules generally allow call centres
and others companies to trade personal address data unless consumers say they
object. [Source]
The
Scottish government has created a privacy and security group to study local
governments’ handling of citizens’ personal data. The group will develop
guidelines for public bodies to follow when handling such data. Growing public
unease concerning data breaches and government surveillance prompted the
group’s formation. “We recognize the need to ensure public confidence in the
public sector’s handling of personal information,” said Scotland’s finance
secretary in a statement. Privacy luminaries in the group include Assistant
Information Commissioner Ken Macdonald; Jerry Fishenden of Microsoft UK,
Rosemary Jay of Pinsent Masons solicitors; and Gus Hosein of LSE and Privacy
International. [Source]
Statewatch
has released a 60-page report on what the group deems to be a “frightening”
grab for personal information, reports The Telegraph. In “The Shape of Things
to Come” report, Statewatch warns that civil liberties and privacy are eroding
at a “breathtaking” rate due to post-9/11 policies that see governments
hoarding personal data on citizens. Statewatch director Tony Bunyan said: “The
national and European states require unfettered powers to access and gather
masses of personal data...so that we can all be safe and secure from perceived
‘threats.’ But how are we to be safe from the state itself...?” [Source]
[Source] [Report:
The Shape Of Things To Come]
The
Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) will investigate the planned five year
data-retention period for a national motorist database. Privacy International
filed an official complaint with the ICO after learning of Home Office plans to
record and retain license plate, time and location data on up to 50 million
drivers each day using a nationwide network of cameras. The network is set to
be fully operation in about four months. In a statement, the ICO said: “Prolonged
retention would need to be clearly justified based on continuing value not on
the mere chance it may become useful.” [Source]
[interview]
[audio
file]
Nearly
half of all computer network security breaches in the world last month occurred
in South Korea, an industry report showed Thursday, tarnishing the nation’s
image as an information technology (IT) stronghold. A network monitoring survey
conducted recently by AhnLab, the nation’s largest security solutions company,
showed that 48% of all network security threats last month occurred in South
Korea. South Korea was trailed by the United States and Japan, with 17% and
1%3, respectively. Hong Kong and India followed, with 7% and 5%, the report
said. [Source]
With
a startling success rate, security researchers disguised as fire inspectors,
exterminators or government safety monitors were able to slip past tellers in
nearly 1,000 bank branches and steal confidential data about customers,
according to a study released last week. Using little more than simple
disguises, basic e-mail trickery and smooth talking, the researchers from Baton
Rouge, La.-based TraceSecurity Inc. walked off with loan applications, laptops,
backup tapes of customer databases and even big computer servers that they
simply carried out the front door. What they were doing was perfectly legal:
The firm was hired by mostly mid-sized banks and credit unions - which the
company would not name - to evaluate their computer networks and physical
security. Most of the branches had 10 or fewer employees on staff at the time they
were duped. It was frighteningly effective: From 2003 to 2008, the researchers
were able to compromise the banks’ security policies and make off with
sensitive data 963 times - out of 1,000 total attempts. [Source]
Right
to Know Week Events in BC: http://www.oipcbc.org/RIGHT_TO_KNOW_2008.htm
Ontario:
IPC Right To Know events: http://www.ipc.on.ca/index.asp?navid=91
The
Hospital Authority (HA) announced plans to spend HK$35 million over the next
two years to better protect patients’ personal data. As part of the
improvements, the chief executives of hospital clusters will become
increasingly accountable for protecting patient data. In addition, the HA will
establish a data security and privacy office to oversee privacy improvements
such as staff awareness programs and the implementation of new technologies.
The HA is acting on some of the 26 recommendations made by a task force formed
after the loss of personal data on 16,000 patients in 10 separate incidents between
April 2007 and May 2008. [Source]
See also: [Seattle-based
Healthcare Organization Agrees to Action Plan
to Address HIPAA Concerns | DHHS decision]
Personally
identifiable information of as many as 2 million Countrywide customers may have
been sold by data thieves, according to the mortgage company. While there have
been no reports of the information being used to commit identity fraud,
Countrywide is offering two years of credit monitoring to affected customers.
The data were allegedly stolen by a former Countrywide employee who downloaded
approximately 20,000 customer records every week for two years. Each batch was
allegedly sold for US $500, or about US 2.5 cents for each record. It appears
that the data were sold to other mortgage brokers. [Source]
[Source]
Other breaches: [Insurance
Office Employee Allegedly Used Customer Data to Open Accounts] [Cyber
Thieves Hit UAE Bank Accounts]
Two
disks found in a trash pile near a Seoul, Korea subway station contain personal
information of 11.1 million GS Caltex customers. GS Caltex is one of South Korea’s largest oil refineries. The information correlates to data gathered
through the company’s bonus card membership sign-up; the bonus card gives
customers discounts at filling stations. The card does not contain bank or
credit card account information. GS
Caltex said there is no evidence that their systems were breached by an outsider
and suggested that it may have been an inside job. Arrest warrants have been issued for three GS Caltex employees. [Source]
[Source]
Cloud
computing services are growing in popularity, but concerns about the privacy of
personal data in the cloud environment exist, according to the findings of a
Pew Internet and American Life project study. Ars Technica reports that
although the study found the majority of Internet users have used cloud
services for e-mail, photo storage and document backup, among other uses, 68
percent of respondents said they would be “very” concerned if providers
analyzed their data to deliver targeted advertisements. Ari Schwartz of the
Center for Democracy and Technology said the Fourth Amendment needs to be
brought “into the twenty-first century,” to prevent the dilution of privacy
protections as cloud computing gains prevalence. [Source]
[PEW Report]
[PDF]
According
to statistics gathered by The Shadowserver Foundation, more than 450,000
personal computers are now part of zombie networks; three months ago, the
number was just over 100,000. The Shadowserver Foundation believes the increase
is due to the rising number of sites that have been manipulated to infect
users’ machines through SQL injection attacks. While the number of compromised
machines is rising, the number of command and control (C&C) servers is
falling. The Shadowserver foundation is a group of volunteers from the
professional security world. [Source] [Source]
[Source]
See also “Network Neutrality in 30 Seconds” Part 2 - “ISPs, Google, and a Hacksaw“
and “Network Neutrality in 30 Seconds” Part 1 - “Drowning the Competition“
The
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania has upheld a lower
court decision that says law enforcement officers must obtain a warrant based
on probable cause to access mobile phone companies’ stored information that
allows them to track a suspect’s past movements. Earlier cases have established
that law enforcement authorities must have a warrant based on probable cause to
be able to track phone users’ movements in real time. Prior to this case,
however, “the government has routinely seized these [old] records without
search warrants.” [Source]
[Source] [Source]
[Federal
Court Decision, September 10, 2008]
In
January 2003, the federal government proposed taking over the matching of
airline passenger names against the government’s list of suspected terrorists,
since too many innocent people were being caught up in bad matches by the
airlines. In January 2009, the government plans to do just that, the Department
of Homeland Security told Congress. The current system has been dogged for
years by sloppy name matches that have snared Sen. Ted Kennedy, a high-powered nun,
small children and for a time, all men named David Nelson. [Source]
Under
pressure from regulators, policymakers and privacy advocates around the world,
Google said that it would further tighten its data retention policy. In its
official blog, the company said it would “anonymize” search records after 9
months, rather than the current 18 months. Google has always kept logs of all
queries conducted on its search engine, along with IP addresses — digital
identifiers linking those searches to specific computers and Internet browsers.
Before last year, Google’s retained those logs indefinitely. But in March of
2007, the company said it would begin anonymizing those logs after 18 months.
Other search companies quickly followed suit, unveiling their own, more
privacy-friendly policies. Google’s move of last March did not please all
privacy advocates, and clearly, it was not enough to placate regulators,
especially in Europe. In its blog post, Google said it adopted the tighter
rules reluctantly, as data retention allows it to offer a better service for
users. “While we’re glad that this will bring some additional improvement in
privacy, we’re also concerned about the potential loss of security, quality,
and innovation that may result from having less data,” the company said. And
the company suggested that a further shortening of its data retention period
would do little to protect users’ privacy. Chris Hoofnagle, a privacy expert
and senior fellow at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology said the new
policy was in line with Google’s approach to privacy. “Google has a vision for
privacy where individuals will not hesitate to share even sensitive personal
information in exchange for access to good products and services,” he said.
“Key to achieving that vision is the removal of consequences for liberal
sharing of personal data. Shortening the identifiable storage time reduces the
risk of unintended, unforeseen uses of the data.” [Source: NYT] [EU
Officials Applaud Google’s Plans]
Google,
whose new, faster Web browser Chrome has raised privacy concerns on both sides
of the Atlantic, said it was taking steps to mask the identities of people who
use the tool. The move comes as privacy advocates expressed concern that the
browser had the potential to give Google a way to track even more of users’
online behavior and create rich profiles of them. Jane Horvath, Google’s senior
privacy counsel, said that the company would be anonymizing the IP address and
the cookies that track users when they type search terms or Web pages into
Chrome’s Omnibox, an all-in-one search and address bar. She said Google also
would anonymize the IP addresses associated with search queries typed in by
users into Google’s standard search bar nine months after they have been
collected. But Google, which already dominates the Internet search and online
advertising fields, still needs to be more forthcoming about its data
collection practices, privacy advocates said. “My main concern is the ability
to collect users’ Web addresses, and therefore your complete surfing on the Web
could be tracked,” Germany’s data protection commissioner, Peter Schaar, said
of Chrome. “The Web is, in fact, a second life. A virtual mirror of one’s real
life, with information about one’s interests, activities, perhaps sexual
orientation.” Schaar said that his office began an inquiry into the browser to
determine whether Google was collecting and correlating personal data in
violation of German data protection law. Google’s Chrome is set up by default
to collect about 2 percent of all keystrokes typed into its Omnibox – whether
Web page addresses or search terms, Horvath said. 1% is comprised of all the
keystrokes for 1% of computer users selected randomly, each day, she said.
Google also collects 1% of all the keystrokes typed into the Omnibox each day.
She said that the data collected may be retained “forever” to help Google
refine its ability to suggest Web pages the user is seeking. But, she said, the
IP address and cookie – a string of numbers that can be used to track a
computer user online – associated with the data will be anonymized so that
“there will be no way to connect it back to the individual.” The exact method
of anonymization had not been settled upon yet. [Source] [Source]
See also: [How To Erase Your Tracks Online]
Mozilla
has revived efforts to incorporate a privacy mode into its browser and will
likely release one in Firefox 3.1, which is expected to go to beta next month.
Like other privacy-sensitive browser options released recently, Firefox 3.1
will neither collect cookies, nor will it retain a history of sites visited.
Data from the browser’s download manager will be scrubbed at the end of each
session. Mozilla had planned to release a privacy mode in the 3.0 version of
Firefox released this past June, but those plans were delayed due to other
pressing modifications. [Source]
[Source]
Facebook
and Ontario privacy commissioner Ann Cavoukian have been collaborating for two
years on ways to help users protect their privacy. Recently they took their
collaboration to a new level, creating a video on the topic. The 10-minute
video aims to educate some of the site’s 100 million users on “the five Ps,”
and takes viewers through Facebook’s privacy settings. “I just want people to
make conscious decisions about what they post on their profile,” Cavoukian said
last week at the youth privacy conference in Toronto. Itbusiness.com sat down
with the commissioner to discuss default privacy settings, employers’ use of
the site and more. Read the full interview here. [Source]
Facebook,
the popular social-networking web site that agreed to step up user protections
following talks with 48 U.S. attorneys general this spring, has become the
largest site to display an icon designed to make cyber abuses easier to report.
Facebook will test the effectiveness of the “Report Abuse!” icon developed by
the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office for six months. Under the agreement,
Facebook will display the icon on at least 1.5 million web pages during the
testing period, and will report monthly on how the icon performs compared to
Facebook’s existing reporting links. [Source]
Privacy
Commissioner Marie Shroff will serve another five years as the nation’s privacy
commissioner. In announcing the appointment, Associate Justice Minister Lianne
Dalziel said that Shroff has been highly effective in her first term, which
began in September 2003. “Shroff has strategic leadership skills and broad
experience across a range of policy areas,” Dalziel said. As privacy
commissioner, Shroff is responsible for promoting and protecting individual
privacy through investigating and resolving complaints, issuing policy, and
reporting on privacy matters, among other duties. [Source]
Pre-paid
mobile phone users must register personal information; including name, birth
date and ID or passport number, before July 2009, six months earlier than the
previous deadline of December, said Le Nam Thang, deputy Minister of
Information and Communication last Wednesday. Pre-paid subscribers nationwide
have been sending registration information, by SMS to 1414, or by registering
online or at telecom company offices since the move was announced in January.
About 50% of subscribers have registered so far. [Source]
Privacy
is not top of mind for the Democratic and Republican candidates for president,
according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Libertarian
candidate for president Bob Barr, citing the absence of any discussion of
privacy issues at the Democratic and Republican national conventions. Barr
spoke at the launch of EPIC’s Privacy ‘08 campaign, which aims to bring privacy
issues to the forefront of debate, reports PC World. “We need to have this
debate,” said EPIC executive director Mark Rotenberg. Barr wants the next
president to temper government surveillance of U.S. residents and to limit
organizations’ use of personal data. [Source]
See also: [Privacy is not a major issue in
US presidential race] and also: [Digital
issues deserve a spot in election campaign: Geist]
An
organization made up of county officials in Iowa has admitted that it was
negotiating with Data Tree for access to county mortgage records and other
documents that contain personally identifiable information of Iowa
residents. IowaLandRecord.org, the
organization, had planned to sell Data Tree its database and updates in the
future for US $11,750 a month. The officials
agreed to hold off on the deal when state legislators became concerned about
the situation. The site is maintained
by the Iowa County Recorders Associations.
The site has been inaccessible since last week, shortly after the issue
was made public in The Des Moines Register.
The site is estimated to hold more than 10 million records. [Source]
[Source]
A
recent study of 159 IT managers revealed that more than half believe that a
leak of confidential data could cost them their job. 56% of those surveyed
believe that data leakage could get them fired, while 74% of 158 employees
polled also feel that losing company data could result in job loss. IBRS
analyst James Turner said that business owners, not IT management, should bear
the blame in the event of a breach. [Source]
French
citizens and some government officials are voicing their opposition to Edvige,
a police database that will store vast amounts of personal information about
anyone over the age of 13 who is “likely to breach public order.” Edvige, which
has been called “Sarkozy’s Big Sister” and an “electronic Bastille,” would
store a wide range of data, including people’s opinions, circle of friends,
sexual orientation, ethnic origins and financial information. The government
maintains that the database is merely an updated, centralized version of
information that has already been gathered for many years. [Source]
[Source]
[Source]
[Source]
[Source]
City
of London police questioned BT earlier this week as part of a probe into the
covert wiretapping and profiling of the internet use of tens of thousands of BT
customers during tests of Phorm’s adware system. Officers have been examining
the dossier of evidence handed to police by campaigners following the 16 June
protest against BT’s planned full deployment of Phorm’s technology. It
included the internal
documents detailing the 2006 trial. There’s no indication as to whether
formal proceedings will be brought. Considerations will include whether it
falls within City of London police’s remit to investigate crimes that affect
the residents or workers of London’s financial district, and whether charges
would be proportionate and in the public interest. [Source]
See also: [Foundation for
Information Policy Research’s legal counsel Analysis] [Home office’s advice obtained by BT]
[Phorm petititon] [European
Commission is pursuing its own investigation of Phorm’s technology and BT’s
trials | Announcement]
Mayor
Cory booker has deployed 111 surveillance cameras around the city as part of
his goal to drastically reduce the rate of violent crime. The cameras are
strategically placed in areas known to experience greater levels of crime. Some
privacy advocates have expressed concern with the idea of public surveillance,
saying, “The costs are high, and the benefits in terms of law enforcement are
low.” Newark’s program has impressed organizations enough that they are moving
facilities into Newark, where the rents are half what they are in nearby
Manhattan. Murders in the city are down 40 percent over last year and shootings
are down 19 percent. More than 100 arrests have been made based on videotaped
evidence. The city has worked with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to
establish parameters to protect citizens’ privacy, including not allowing
cameras to look inside people’s homes and storing the recorded images for no
more than 30 days. [Source]
Tracesmart
has been granted access to receive death registration information by the
General Register Office. The fraud prevention firm said pension schemes will be
able to use the information to scan members to prevent benefits being drawn
after a member has died. Schemes will also be able to update personal
information such as addresses from the data. Tracesmart said it is the first
company in the UK to be given access to such information. [Source] See also: [Footnote, A Social Network To Help Us Remember
The Dead]
A
social networking site has been created for use solely by US intelligence
agencies. Called A-Space, the site was
designed to allow analysts to share information, to “think out loud, think in
public amongst their peers.” The site,
which is scheduled to launch on September 22, will be on the US government’s
Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System. It will be available only to members of the intelligence
agencies, and will be monitored by a system designed to recognize anomalous
behavior to catch potential infiltrators. [Source]
[Source]
US
Senators Tom Carper (D-Delaware) and Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut) have
introduced Senate bill 3474, the 2008 Federal Information Security Management
Act. Among the bill’s provisions is a requirement that federal agencies appoint
chief information security officers; the CISOs would have the authority to
block network access if established security policies are not being adhered to.
The bill would also require that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
conduct annual tests to determine if attackers could access sensitive
government data. Senator Carper noted that the current Federal Information
Security Management Act is an exercise in paperwork rather than an effective
means of determining the security of federal computer networks. [Source] [Source]
The
Consumer Data Protection Act (AB 1656) that is now before California Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger would require businesses to provide more information
about data breaches when they occur, but would also impose specific
requirements on businesses for protecting customers’ financial data. The latter is a controversial idea; Gartner
analyst Avivah Litan notes that while the government can impose breach disclosure
regulations, “it’s totally inappropriate for a state to mandate security
controls.” Lobbyists are more optimistic that this version of the bill will
pass now that a provision that would have required retailers to bear the cost
of replacing cards affected by breaches has been removed. [Source]
An
employee has no reasonable expectation of privacy in personal files stored on a
company-owned computer and an employer’s consent makes a police search lawful,
an appeals court says in a ruling of first impression in New Jersey. The Aug. 29
ruling affirms a former bookkeeper’s conviction of stealing over $650,000 in
electronic fund transfers, records of which were found through warrantless
searches of the laptop and desktop computers he used at work. “We conclude ...
that neither the law nor society recognize as legitimate defendant’s subjective
expectation of privacy in a workplace computer he used to commit a crime,”
Judge Marie Simonelli wrote for the three-judge panel in State v. M.A.,
A-4922-06. [Source]
Twenty
percent of companies surveyed by Careerbuilder.com said they check job
candidates’ social networking profiles before making an offer of employment. Of
those surveyed who do not check such profiles, nine percent said they would
begin reviewing them in the future. The study revealed that while 24% of
employers have hired a job candidate based on their profile, 33% cited a social
networking profile as having been the reason not to hire a potential staffer. Those
employers cited “inappropriate” or “provocative” photographs and drug or
alcohol use as popular reasons not to hire. [Source]
[Globe
& Mail compiles biographies from Facebook]
+++